A contract is considered void in all of the following situations EXCEPT?

A contract that has unequal consideration is generally not considered void. While consideration—the value exchanged in a contract—should be present for a contract to be enforceable, the law does not require that the consideration be equal for both parties. It recognizes that parties may enter into agreements for various reasons that may result in unequal value exchange. This means that as long as something of value is exchanged, the contract can still be valid.

In contrast, a contract would be void if one party is a minor, since contracts with minors are generally unenforceable to protect their interests. Additionally, if consideration is incomplete (meaning not all agreed-upon aspects are fulfilled), or if the parties cannot reach an agreement (which means there is no mutual assent), those situations can render a contract void or unenforceable.

Therefore, the distinction lies in the nature of consideration; it does not need to be equal for a contract to be valid, which is why that particular scenario is the exception among the options listed.